Skin Cancer Risk Prediction

Machine Learning for Clinical Risk Classification

Machine Learning
Healthcare
Classification
Interpretable machine learning for clinical skin cancer prediction.
Published

December 17, 2025

Predicting skin cancer risk using interpretable machine learning models

This project explored how demographic, clinical, and behavioral factors can be combined to estimate skin cancer risk. I compared regularized logistic regression models and evaluated their ability to balance predictive performance with clinical interpretability.

View Source Code View Full Report ← Back to Projects

Role

Machine Learning Researcher

Domain

Healthcare Analytics

Stack

R · glmnet · Logistic Regression

Techniques

LASSO · Ridge · Cross Validation

Project Snapshot

Problem

Early identification of individuals at higher risk for skin cancer can improve screening strategies and preventative care.

Solution

Built and evaluated regularized logistic regression models to identify important predictors while reducing overfitting.

Outcome

Compared LASSO and Ridge models using cross-validation, feature selection, calibration analysis, and predictive performance metrics.

Overview

Skin cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer worldwide, yet many of its strongest risk factors are already available through demographic, lifestyle, and clinical information.

The goal of this project was to build interpretable predictive models capable of estimating an individual’s likelihood of developing skin cancer while understanding which variables contributed most strongly to prediction.

The Challenge

High-dimensional predictors

Clinical datasets often contain many correlated variables that can lead to unstable models.

Preventing overfitting

The model needed to generalize well to unseen patients rather than memorizing the training data.

Model interpretability

Healthcare applications require models that clinicians can understand and trust.

Performance evaluation

Beyond prediction accuracy, calibration and feature stability were important for evaluating model quality.

Modeling Pipeline

The project followed a structured supervised learning workflow from data preparation through model evaluation.

1
📊

Data Preparation

Cleaned demographic, behavioral, and clinical variables.

2
🧹

Feature Engineering

Processed predictors and standardized variables.

3
📈

Model Training

Fit logistic regression with LASSO and Ridge regularization.

4
🔄

Cross Validation

Selected optimal regularization parameters.

5
📉

Model Evaluation

Compared predictive performance and calibration.

6

Interpretation

Identified the most influential predictors and assessed clinical usefulness.

End-to-end machine learning workflow for clinical risk prediction.

Technical Stack

  • R
  • glmnet
  • Logistic Regression
  • LASSO
  • Ridge Regression
  • Cross Validation
  • ROC Analysis
  • Calibration
  • Feature Selection

What I Built

Predictive Models

Built multiple regularized logistic regression models to predict skin cancer risk while balancing model complexity and interpretability.

Hyperparameter Optimization

Used cross-validation to identify optimal penalty parameters for both LASSO and Ridge regression.

Model Comparison

Compared predictive performance, calibration, and feature selection across competing models.

Clinical Interpretation

Analyzed selected variables to better understand which patient characteristics contributed most strongly to predicted risk.

Key Results

🩺
2

Regularized models compared

📊
CV

Cross-validation used for model selection

📈
ML

Interpretable classification framework

What I Learned

This project reinforced that predictive performance alone is not enough in healthcare applications. Regularization techniques such as LASSO and Ridge help improve generalization while producing models that remain interpretable for clinical decision making.

I also gained experience evaluating machine learning models beyond simple accuracy by incorporating cross-validation, calibration, and feature selection into the modeling process.

Full Technical Report

The complete technical report, including methodology, statistical analysis, and model evaluation, is available below.

View Source Code

View Full Report (PDF)

← Back to Projects